The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

Sofia Correia A...

How do we define (and meet) outcomes for pupils with SEND?

Schools have a duty to put pupils' needs and aspirations at the centre of SEND provision. It is vital that we understand 'outcomes', and the steps we can take to meet them.

Throughout my time as a teaching assistant, I've often discussed: 

  • how we define ‘outcomes’ in relation to pupils with SEND
  • how we can support pupils in thinking about what they want to achieve
  • how we can work collaboratively with pupils and parents to meet such outcomes.

Gareth has asked if I could encapsulate some of my thoughts; what I think outcomes are, and how we might set out to meet them. 

Putting pupils first

One could define an outcome as ‘the benefit or difference made to an individual as a result of a change’ (Amide, 2015). This should be from a person-centered perspective, and enshrine a pupil’s needs and aspirations.

An outcome will not always signal change

Outcomes should be tailored to (and informed by) pupils and parents/carers – the importance of co-production cannot be overstated in this respect.

An example of outcomes being informed by a pupil's needs and aspirations. 

An outcome will not always signal change, as it can be predicated on something that already is working well; this must be part of a personalised discussion/process; not ‘done to’ but produced collaboratively.

In line with this pupil-centered approach, the EHCP process should identify a pupil’s needs (from the Needs Assessment), and assimilate the strategies that already work with ones that would benefit from further consideration. 

A cyclical process

EHCPs must formulate specific actions to address needs and meet outcomes. Considering the example above, actions could include: 

  • setting a (flexible) timeframe, for instance a grid with the necessary time for student to read and write, so the pupil gains reflexive knowledge on their needs (20 minutes to read, 40 minutes to write)
  • using a clock to remind the pupil of time, which will make him feel in control of his own time.

These actions should be checked regularly by the SENCO. If needs have changed, or actions prove unsuccessful, the whole process must be re-evaluated in conversation with the pupil.

The importance of co-production cannot be overstated

Remember that as with people, an outcome is always likely to change.

As with life, the process is a cycle: do keep 'Assess, Plan, Do, Review' in mind!

References

More from Optimus

Categories: 

Similar Posts

Gareth D Morewood

International perspectives and broadening horizons

Gareth D Morewood reflects on his latest international conferences, sharing lessons from the inspirational contacts he has made during the last few weeks. I have been very fortunate over the last few years, not only to gain some amazing insights and experiences in UK schools and settings but also...
Read more...
Freddie Roberts

Researching for Optimus' SEND Update conference

Our annual SEND Update conference takes place on 23 May. Conference Producer Freddie Roberts shares what he discovered through his research calls, and what you can expect on the day. Going into researching my first SEND conference for Optimus, I was unsure about what to expect in terms of agenda...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

Autism and peer relationships

What can research tell us about peer relations among autistic learners, and what can we do in our schools to support? I often talk about the peer group being one of the most untapped resources in our schools. Indeed, previously we have heard first-hand from young people about their real, lived...
Read more...