The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

Sofia Correia A...

How do we define (and meet) outcomes for pupils with SEND?

Schools have a duty to put pupils' needs and aspirations at the centre of SEND provision. It is vital that we understand 'outcomes', and the steps we can take to meet them.

Throughout my time as a teaching assistant, I've often discussed: 

  • how we define ‘outcomes’ in relation to pupils with SEND
  • how we can support pupils in thinking about what they want to achieve
  • how we can work collaboratively with pupils and parents to meet such outcomes.

Gareth has asked if I could encapsulate some of my thoughts; what I think outcomes are, and how we might set out to meet them. 

Putting pupils first

One could define an outcome as ‘the benefit or difference made to an individual as a result of a change’ (Amide, 2015). This should be from a person-centered perspective, and enshrine a pupil’s needs and aspirations.

An outcome will not always signal change

Outcomes should be tailored to (and informed by) pupils and parents/carers – the importance of co-production cannot be overstated in this respect.

An example of outcomes being informed by a pupil's needs and aspirations. 

An outcome will not always signal change, as it can be predicated on something that already is working well; this must be part of a personalised discussion/process; not ‘done to’ but produced collaboratively.

In line with this pupil-centered approach, the EHCP process should identify a pupil’s needs (from the Needs Assessment), and assimilate the strategies that already work with ones that would benefit from further consideration. 

A cyclical process

EHCPs must formulate specific actions to address needs and meet outcomes. Considering the example above, actions could include: 

  • setting a (flexible) timeframe, for instance a grid with the necessary time for student to read and write, so the pupil gains reflexive knowledge on their needs (20 minutes to read, 40 minutes to write)
  • using a clock to remind the pupil of time, which will make him feel in control of his own time.

These actions should be checked regularly by the SENCO. If needs have changed, or actions prove unsuccessful, the whole process must be re-evaluated in conversation with the pupil.

The importance of co-production cannot be overstated

Remember that as with people, an outcome is always likely to change.

As with life, the process is a cycle: do keep 'Assess, Plan, Do, Review' in mind!

References

More from Optimus

Categories: 

Similar Posts

Gareth D Morewood

Low Arousal experiences during lockdown: learning from a family perspective

Gareth D Morewood seeks first-hand experiences from families and draws out five positive lessons to take forward in practice. The recent months have been extremely challenging for everyone across the globe. The word unprecedented is often used, but rarely warranted. I think it is justified with...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

Listening to the voices of young people: understanding stress

Gareth D Morewood reminds us of the importance of having simple strategies to manage stress and create a low arousal culture in schools. Towards the end of the last year I was fortunate to deliver some workshops on stress and wellbeing to two groups of young people organised by the charity...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

Autism and inclusion in a mainstream secondary school

Gareth D Morewood reflects on how his previous school has successfully created an inclusive environment for their pupils with autism. During my last year as SENCO, my school was fortunate to be part of the Autism Education Trust (AET) good practice case studies . The case studies highlight eight...
Read more...