The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

Lisa Gill

SEND assessment: your top questions answered

Keynote speakers Lesley Cox HMI and Richard Aird OBE return to answer some of the most popular questions from our recent conference on 'measuring what matters' with SEND.

Richard Aird

When P levels are removed, how will we be able to assess where pupils who, despite being in Year 1, are working below the Year 1 curriculum? 

'You will be able to assess these pupils with the pre-key stage standards, and/or Engagement for Learning (EfL).'

How does one measure progress in engagement quantifiably, or will this not be a requirement?

'Engagement is only a critical lens with which to assess whether or not pupils are making progress. It was not designed as a curriculum-based assessment, in order to prevent schools 'teaching to the test' as with P levels.

No data will need to be submitted concerning the statutory use of EfL, but schools will still need to gather EfL data if they are to determine how well pupils are progressing towards their personalised targets. The engagement scale will provide a means to assessing the progression of scores over time.'

What are the next steps after the Rochford Review? If we go out on our own and write our own pre-key stage levels/measures, will we find we have wasted our time later on?

'After Rochford, it is really up to schools to propose anything or put forward concerns via the consultation. However, the government is becoming increasingly favourable of schools developing their own curricula and assessment.

With an expressed interest in all schools becoming academies, the national curriculum will largely become irrelevant. The onus will then be on schools to devise their own summative and formative assessments.

It is important that SLTs and governors agree on the details of their assessment policy, which should clearly state exactly what forms of assessment are being used and what purpose the resulting data are put to.

Should the government introduce any new statutory assessment, schools should continue to do their own thing and simply extract the relevant data to suit the government’s agenda. This will prevent the government from dictating what is important for a school's pupils.'

How do you report progress for children who are progressing very slowly or making very little 'measurable' progress?

'Lateral progress can be monitored and reported on objectively by means of the engagement scale. Using this regularly will allow you to assess pupil engagement on a specific improvement target, and refine teaching in response to any EfL improvements.

This must be led by teacher enquiry, so that any peaks or troughs in pupil engagement may be analysed and acted upon.

Improving engagement for learning will facilitate improvements in learning. The resulting numerical scores will provide the data needed to quantify lateral progress.'

For more information on the Rochford Review and what it means for schools, read Richard's three-part series:

  1. Changing the culture of assessment
  2. Recommendations and methodologies
  3. Implementation in schools

Lesley Cox

What is the Ofsted criteria for classifying a child as a 'low attainer'?

'Ofsted does not determine this. Inspectors will want to check on the progress of all pupils with SEND, looking at low, middle and high prior attainers. This is based on their prior attainment at the end of previous key stages.

The new dashboards and RoL assessment guidance includes information about the attainment and progress of these different groups.'

It was mentioned that if you can demonstrate good progress, that is enough for Ofsted. But without national benchmarks, what is 'good'?

'That is for school leaders to determine, using appropriate means to moderate their assessment of progress. If national benchmarks are available, they should be used. In settings where national benchmarks are lacking or inappropriate, then inspectors would look to see that leaders have benchmarked progress using other means, which could include:

  • external assessments
  • peer reviews
  • commercial bench marking tools
  • any other method that can reliably indicate that progress is either good or better.'

Progression Guidance is commonly used and accepted by Ofsted. However, it is out of date. Is there a new method of target setting currently being explored?

'Local and national groups/partnerships are putting a lot of work into this. Ofsted does not dictate what should be used. It is the responsibility of school leaders to determine what is appropriate for their pupils.'

 

Categories: 
Tags: 

Subscribe to Optimus Education's Blog

Join other educators and get the latest Optimus blogs direct to your inbox.
Your data is safe with us: Privacy Policy

Similar Posts

Gareth D Morewood

National SEND inquiry: it's time to have your say

A new inquiry promises to review the SEND reforms. We can't afford to waste this opportunity to make our voices heard. The implementation period of the SEND reforms has officially ended, leaving at best a mixed picture with regard to outcomes for young people and families; at worst, a total...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

Investing in interventions: what does the research tell us?

What makes an intervention effective? How are schools to decide what to fund or deliver? Gareth D Morewood explains what we can glean from the existing literature. I've been involved in many discussions around how we evidence the effectiveness of interventions in improving learning outcomes,...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

SEND reforms implementation: for better or worse?

A humble SENCO's honest appraisal of the progress we've made over the last four years. 1 April 2018 was a significant date, circled on calendars and etched into memories, for one reason: the end of the implementation period for the SEND Reforms. Or so we thought… There are many ‘old’ Statements of...
Read more...