The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

Sofia Correia A...

How do we define (and meet) outcomes for pupils with SEND?

Schools have a duty to put pupils' needs and aspirations at the centre of SEND provision. It is vital that we understand 'outcomes', and the steps we can take to meet them.

Throughout my time as a teaching assistant, I've often discussed: 

  • how we define ‘outcomes’ in relation to pupils with SEND
  • how we can support pupils in thinking about what they want to achieve
  • how we can work collaboratively with pupils and parents to meet such outcomes.

Gareth has asked if I could encapsulate some of my thoughts; what I think outcomes are, and how we might set out to meet them. 

Putting pupils first

One could define an outcome as ‘the benefit or difference made to an individual as a result of a change’ (Amide, 2015). This should be from a person-centered perspective, and enshrine a pupil’s needs and aspirations.

An outcome will not always signal change

Outcomes should be tailored to (and informed by) pupils and parents/carers – the importance of co-production cannot be overstated in this respect.

An example of outcomes being informed by a pupil's needs and aspirations. 

An outcome will not always signal change, as it can be predicated on something that already is working well; this must be part of a personalised discussion/process; not ‘done to’ but produced collaboratively.

In line with this pupil-centered approach, the EHCP process should identify a pupil’s needs (from the Needs Assessment), and assimilate the strategies that already work with ones that would benefit from further consideration. 

A cyclical process

EHCPs must formulate specific actions to address needs and meet outcomes. Considering the example above, actions could include: 

  • setting a (flexible) timeframe, for instance a grid with the necessary time for student to read and write, so the pupil gains reflexive knowledge on their needs (20 minutes to read, 40 minutes to write)
  • using a clock to remind the pupil of time, which will make him feel in control of his own time.

These actions should be checked regularly by the SENCO. If needs have changed, or actions prove unsuccessful, the whole process must be re-evaluated in conversation with the pupil.

The importance of co-production cannot be overstated

Remember that as with people, an outcome is always likely to change.

As with life, the process is a cycle: do keep 'Assess, Plan, Do, Review' in mind!

References

More from Optimus

Categories: 

Subscribe to Optimus Education's Blog

Join other educators and get the latest Optimus blogs direct to your inbox.
Your data is safe with us: Privacy Policy

Similar Posts

Julie Kennelly

Improving in-class support across the board

Prioritising the time and attention of support staff is a daily challenge in many schools. Here's one simple but effective technique for coordinating cover. We are all too aware of the financial and systemic barriers to provision for SEND that is appropriately resourced and well allocated. As a new...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

SEND: the E is not for exclusion

Too many schools are turning away their most vulnerable learners when additional needs are not met. This must stop. A few weeks ago, I argued that excluding pupils should always be a last resort; that schools and parents can find more positive solutions if they work together; and that for pupils...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

Autism and sexual health: need it be a challenge?

Understanding sexuality and relationships can one of the most challenging areas for a young person with ASC. Here are some resources to support a proactive approach. In my last post, I suggested some ‘go-to’ books for a SENCO’s autism reading list. One book I chose is the Independent Woman's...
Read more...