The Optimus blog

The blog that inspires leaders in the UK education sector

Gareth D Morewood

SEND: the S is not for special

Labelling for the sake of convenience has profound implications for young people and their families. All schools should ditch the deficit model.

When I was appointed as SENCO 15 years ago, one of my first actions was to remove all references to 'SEN' from our faculty, my job title and our day-to-day conversations. We became the curriculum support faculty (supporting both the academic and 'hidden' curriculum) while I became the school's director of curriculum support.

This was a very important decision as we moved away from a discourse of 'special' and the deficit of labels to a more holistic approach.

What's in a name?

Frustratingly, insufficient attention is given to the idea that certain 'special education' labels can imply deficiencies and shortcomings in children, meaning the surrounding discourse is one of deficit.

A good example of this is the ASD/ASC debate, as covered well in Lynn McCann's blog post, 'What's in a name?' Needless to say, I see 'disorder' as a negative word with too great a focus on the problems. I'm quite certain that language used to 'label' does have a significant impact on our thinking.

Some might argue that language in itself is not the problem, but the problematic belief system that the language reflects. This isn't the first time in history that differences and disabilities have been singled out.

  • In the Middle Ages, giving birth to a child with a disability was one of many potential signs of witchcraft.
  • In 16th Century Holland, people suffering from leprosy were seen as sinners and had their belongings confiscated by the state
  • In British folklore, disability was associated with evil and figures of ridicule. 

The list is endless.

‘The term “special educational needs” (SEN) refers to a set of systems for organising educational processes and allocating resources (Terzi, 2010).

Although we, as a community of scholars, may recognise these systems as problematic for the ways in which they create and reinforce a separation between “normal” education for children and “special” or “abnormal” education for disabled children, the launch of “new” policies for “SEN” reinforces an acceptance of disabling approaches to education.’ 

Penketh, 2014

The debate must move forward

Changing the nomenclature hasn’t stopped people from lowering their aspirations and perceiving young people with disabilities as less than or different to the norm. Duncan-Andrade and Morrell (2008) describe young people ‘plugged into the current educational system and expected to function’.

The SEND reforms should have addressed this very issue. Sadly, as many have reported, this is most certainly not the case. Most of the historical debates around inclusion have fixated on this ‘human’ and ‘equal’ rights-based notion (Mittler, 2000) – now is the time to move forward.

Debate continues to surround the discourse of inclusion; ‘special education’ is sometimes referred to as a discourse of exclusion (Barton 2003), while the ‘empowerment’ perspective is often dismissed as ‘impractical’ and ‘ideological’ (Thomas and Loxley, 2007).

However, now is a more important time to move away from a discourse of deficit towards something more positive and outcome-led.

What can we do?

If you are a SENCO, teaching assistant, school leader, governor or anyone else in a position to initiate discussions, your first step should be to look at what your department is called and what language the school uses in correspondence. Consider the mindset this all contributes to and the impact your terms and definitions is having on individuals and families.

There have been some innovative efforts that put taxonomy at the start of a shift in focus; a discussion for 15 years ago, perhaps, but nevertheless something that we should be talking about now.

Having discussed, reconsidered and rebranded, it's important that you keep looking for solutions as opposed to propagating the myth that young people can be ‘fixed’.

This half term, how about giving yourself time to assess the impact of language (‘special’, ‘SEN’) on identification and subsequent provision. Is it time for change?

Use research to inform practice

Now is the time to focus our attention on what the latest evidence-based research tells us works to support learners in the classroom.

This May, our Annual SEND Update conference will give you the skills to translate the latest research into effective practice.

Find out more

Further reading

Harry, B. and Klingner, J., Discarding the Defecit Model

Mason, M. and Reiser, R., Altogether Better

The history of attitudes to disabled people

References

Barton, L., (2003) The politics of education for all, in Inclusive Education: diverse perspectives, Nind, M., Rix, J., Sheehy, K., & Simmons, K. OU: David Fulton.

Duncan-Andrade, J. & Morrell, E. The Art of Critical Pedagogy - Possibilities for Moving from Theory to Practice in Urban Schools  (Counterpoints, 2008).

Mittler, P. Working Towards Inclusive Education: Social Contexts (David Fulton, 2000).

Penketh, C., 'Invention and repair: disability and education after the UK Coalition Government', Disability & Society 29/9 (2014), pp. 1486-1490.

Terzi, L., Justice and Equality in Education – A Capability Perspective on Disability and Special Educational Needs (Continuum, 2010).

Thomas, G. & Loxley, A., Deconstructing Special Education and Constructing Inclusion (Open University Press, 2007). 
 

Categories: 
Tags: 

Subscribe to Optimus Education's Blog

Join other educators and get the latest Optimus blogs direct to your inbox.
Your data is safe with us: Privacy Policy

Similar Posts

Gareth D Morewood

National SEND inquiry: it's time to have your say

A new inquiry promises to review the SEND reforms. We can't afford to waste this opportunity to make our voices heard. The implementation period of the SEND reforms has officially ended, leaving at best a mixed picture with regard to outcomes for young people and families; at worst, a total...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

Investing in interventions: what does the research tell us?

What makes an intervention effective? How are schools to decide what to fund or deliver? Gareth D Morewood explains what we can glean from the existing literature. I've been involved in many discussions around how we evidence the effectiveness of interventions in improving learning outcomes,...
Read more...
Gareth D Morewood

SEND reforms implementation: for better or worse?

A humble SENCO's honest appraisal of the progress we've made over the last four years. 1 April 2018 was a significant date, circled on calendars and etched into memories, for one reason: the end of the implementation period for the SEND Reforms. Or so we thought… There are many ‘old’ Statements of...
Read more...